|
A GUIDE TO MARKING
REFEREES by the NATIONAL REVIEW
BOARD
|
Mark |
Criteria
for award of the mark |
| 91-100 |
The
referee was extremely accurate in decision-making and very
successfully,
controlled the game using management and communication skills to create
an environment of fair play, adding real value to the game. |
| 81-90 |
The
referee was very accurate in decision-making and successfully
controlled the game using management and communication skills
to create an environment of fair play.
|
| 71 - 80 |
The referee was accurate in decision-making and
controlled the game well, communicating with the players,
making a positive contribution towards fair play. |
| 61-70 |
The
referee was reasonably accurate in decision making, controlled
the game quite well and communicated with players,
establishing a reasonable degree of fair play.
|
| 51-60 |
The
referee had some shortcomings in the level of accuracy of
decision-making and control, with only limited success in
communicating with the players resulting in variable fair
play.
|
| 50 and below |
The
referee had significant shortcomings in the level of accuracy
of decision making and control with poor communication with
the players which resulted in low levels of fair play
|
PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY
BEFORE MARKING THE REFEREE.
DO NOT MARK DOWN THE
REFEREE JUST BECAUSE A DECISION GOES AGAINST YOUR TEAM. A
mark within each mark range can be given to reflect the referee’s
performance e.g. a mark of 79 indicates a somewhat better
performance than a mark of 71.
A mark between 71 and 80 represents the standard
of refereeing expected.
When
a mark of 50 or less is awarded, an explanation must be provided to
the League or Competition by completing the appropriate marking
form. It must include comments which could help improve the
referee’s future performances. Even where a referee has
significant shortcomings there will have been some positive aspects
which should be given credit; extremely low marks (below 20) should
be very rare.
|
